블로그

Benchmarking focus: candidate eligibility rates

The best background check program should reflect the specific needs of your organization. Yet, sometimes it helps to know what others in your industry are doing, how their screening strategy is faring and what lessons you can learn from their successes and failures—and apply to your program.

Here, we’ve hand-picked a few industries and we’re sharing an interesting performance metric—candidate eligibility rates—to help you better understand your program performance. This simple number can potentially reveal if you’re rejecting or accepting too many or too few candidates compared to your industry. From there, you can internally review your program, if necessary, and adjust it to better align with your industry. NOTE: The screening statistics provided below include aggregate data from the 66+ million annual global searches performed by First Advantage.

To hire or not to hire? Candidate eligibility rates offer cross-industry visibility.

Many organizations use an automated screening matrix, sometimes called an “adjudication matrix,” to efficiently determine if a candidate is eligible for hire, based on the results of their background check. These matrices digitally analyze the results of different background check components (think: criminal searches, verifications, etc.) using a list of pre-set hiring guidelines and return the overallbackground screening status as “eligible” for hire or “decisional.” Decisional outcomes must be manually reviewed by the employer’s hiring team, who will make the final decision as to eligibility.

This metric, known as the candidate eligibility rate, essentially reveals how many candidates are passing your background check and proceeding to the next step of the hiring process. According to our customer data, candidate eligibility rates vary substantially across industries.

  • Within Retail, 98.5 percent of candidates were eligible for hire after criminal screening, while 7.1 percent of retail candidates required a decisional review by the employer.
  • Similarly, 96.9 percent of candidates within the Transportation industry were eligible for hire after criminal screening; however, 19.6 percent of candidates required a decisional review.
  • Staffing firms experienced similar numbers, with 95.5 percent of candidates eligible for hire after criminal screening, and 15.2 percent requiring decisional review.
  • Healthcare is different. Only 78.5 percent of candidates were eligible for hire after criminal screening, and the industry experienced an 18.8 decisional rate.
  • Financial Services dips even further, with just 67 percent of candidates eligible for hire and a nearly a third—29.3 percent—requiring a decisional review.

Recognize what is commonly accepted and what is not.

Generally, regulated industries such as Healthcare and Financial Services follow strict industry guidelines when hiring new employees, which explains the lower eligibility rates and higher decisional rates. On the other hand, unregulated industries with higher turnover rates such as Retail and Staffing often need to fill many positions, fast. As a result, they may have fewer hiring restrictions, resulting in consistently higher eligibility rates.

If your company operates within any of these industries:

  • Take note of your industry’s eligibility rate and compare it to your own candidate eligibility rate.
  • If your organization’s eligibility rate is notably higher or lower, consider reviewing your screening guidelines with your internal hiring team and/or your legal counsel. It might be time to update your adjudication matrix, or simply adjust the list of acceptable or unacceptable data points fueling your adjudication matrix.

If you decide to revise your screening guidelines, always work closely with your legal counsel to ensure compliance with the latest federal, state and municipal consumer protection laws (think: Fair Credit Reporting Act, “Ban the Box,” EEOC individualized assessments for criminal records, etc.), and industry requirements.

Review and consider the following data and analytics within various industries by reading the full report: Vertical Trends & Insights: Retail, Transportation, Staffing, Healthcare and Financial Services. VIEW NOW

이 콘텐츠는 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 퍼스트 어드밴티지는 법률 회사가 아니며, 본 콘텐츠는 법률 자문으로 여겨지지 않으며 그러한 의도가 없습니다. 또한, 본 콘텐츠가 가장 최신 법률 또는 기타 정보를 반영하지 않을 수도 있습니다.

자신의 특정 상황에 대해 법률 자문을 받기 위해서는 별도의 법률 전문가와 상담하시기 바랍니다.

본 콘텐츠의 정보에 근거하여 어떠한 행동을 하거나 하지 않는 것은 독자 또는 사용자의 책임입니다. 개별 변호사나 법률 자문만이 본 콘텐츠에 포함된 정보와 그 해석이 사용자의 특정 상황에 적절한지에 대한 여부를 보장할 수 있습니다. 본 콘텐츠의 사용 및 접근은 독자 또는 사용자가 퍼스트 어드밴티지와 변호사-의뢰인 관계를 형성하는 것이 아님을 안내 드립니다.